COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CERVICAL SPINE ZERO-P INTERBODY FUSION AND INTERVERTEBRAL BONE GRAFTING IN THE TREATMENT OF SINGLE-SEGMENT CERVICAL DISC DISEASE

Fangjun Zeng, Hui You, Chaoyang Guo, Bi Zhang, Yaohong Wu, Feixiang Lin, Jianping Chen^*

Department of Spinal Orthopaedic Surgery, Ganzhou People's Hospital, Ganzhou, 341099, PR China

Objective: To investigate the treatment of cervical spine with Zero-P interbody fusion and intervertebral bone grafting in single segment cervical disc disease. 

Methods: This study was conducted from January 2013 to January 2019, during which a total of 40 patients with cervical disc disease were selected for comparative study. Group processing is performed by random number method. The experimental group and the conventional group were treated with cervical spine Zero-P interbody fusion and intervertebral bone grafting. The treatment effectiveness, pain level, quality of life, and functional score were observed and compared between the two groups. 

Results: After the interventions, the overall treatment efficiency of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the conventional group. The data were quite different. The comparison results met the statistical significance table (P<0.05). The pain scores of the experimental group and the conventional group before the clinical intervention. There was no significant difference (P>0.05). After the intervention, the pain scores of the experimental group were more prominent, and the data were very different. The statistical significance table (P<0.05) had a large difference in the quality of life scores and satisfaction data of the patients in the experimental group. The results of data comparison between groups were significantly different, which met the statistical significance criteria (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the neurological scores between the experimental group and the conventional group before the clinical intervention (P>0.05). After intervention, the neurological function scores of the experimental group were significantly better than those of the conventional group. The data were very different and met the statistical significance table (P<0.05). 

Conclusion: The results of cervical-Zero-P interbody fusion and intervertebral bone grafting in the treatment of single-segment cervical disc disease are obvious. The application value of cervical Zero-P interbody fusion is outstanding and can be significantly improved. The patient's limb function, optimizing the quality of life, is worth promoting.