Authors

Juan Cao#, *, Chen-Xing Gu#, Shi-Jie Wang

Departments

Department of Emergency, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing 102206, China

Abstract

Introduction: To explore and analyze the clinical value of prehospital emergency care in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). 

Materials and methods: Total 168 patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by our hospital from January 2018 to January 2021 were selected and divided into control group (84 cases) and observation group (84 cases) according to the different ways taken by pre-hospital emergency, and the patients in the control group were sent to the hospital by their families and then given emergency treatment, while the patients in the observation group were given emergency treatment by emergency personnel on the spot, and the two groups were compared and analyzed for the first aid effect, survival, cardiac function recovery and vital signs and complications of the two groups were compared and analyzed.

Results: The results showed that the total effective rate and survival rate of first aid in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (P<0.05), and the recovery of cardiac function after 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours of first aid in both groups was found to be better in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the incidence of treatment complications in the observation group was significantly lower (P<0.05). Moreover, the observation group has a lower prescription dose of nitroglycerin, aspirin, and captopril than the control group.

Conclusion: The clinical value of pre-hospital emergency care in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction is high, which can improve the survival rate of patients and promote their cardiac function recovery, and is worth promoting its application in clinical practice.

Keywords

AMI, pre-hospital emergency care, recovery of cardiac function, clinical value.

DOI:

10.19193/0393-6384_2022_5_514